Session 20 Notes, Section 9-5
Testing the Difference Between Two Means when there are small dependent
samples
Special t tests allow researchers to compare population parameters,
such as means, when we have small dependent samples.
At the end of this session you will be able to:
If you have learned all of these objectives, then close this window to
return to where you were.
- Independent and Dependent Samples
- Dependent Samples are samples that are paired or matched in some way.
- Independent and Dependent Samples
- Examples of Dependent Samples
- Samples in which the same subjects are used in a pre-post situation are
dependent.
- Another type of dependent samples are samples matched on the basis of
variables extraneous to the study.
- Two Notes of Caution
- When subjects are matched according to one variable, the matching
process does not eliminate the influence of other variables.
- When the same subjects are used for a pre-post study, sometimes the
knowledge that they are participating in a study can influence the results.
- Special t test for Dependent Means
- Hypotheses: Possible hypotheses are:
-

- µD is the expected mean of the
differences of the matched pairs.
- General Procedure—Finding the Test Value
- The procedure is outlined on page 466.
- t Test Formulas
- The formula for the t test for dependent samples:
.
- Procedures for testing the difference between Means for Dependent
Samples:
- State the hypotheses and identify the claim
- Find the Critical Value(s)
- Compute the test value
- Make a table of the score and the differences:
.
- Find the differences and place the results in column A
- Find the mean of the differences
- Square the differences and place the results in column B.
Complete the table
- Find the standard deviation of the differences
.
- Find the test value
- Make the decision
- Summarize the results
Return to objectives
A physical education director claims by taking a special vitamin, a weight
lifter can increase his strength. Eight athletes are selected and given a test
of strength using the standard bench press. After two weeks of regular training,
supplemented with the vitamin, they are tested again. Test the effectiveness of
the vitamin regimen at α= 0.05. Each value in these data represents the maximum
number of pounds the athlete can bench press. Assume that the variable is
approximately normally distributed. Determine whether or not there is enough
evidence to support the claim.
| Athlete |
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
 |
| Before (X1) |
 |
|
204 |
|
229 |
|
190 |
|
207 |
|
266 |
|
256 |
|
217 |
|
216 |
 |
| After (X2) |
 |
|
217 |
|
240 |
|
187 |
|
205 |
|
277 |
|
254 |
|
228 |
|
216 |
- State the hypotheses and identify the claim.
- In order for the vitamin to be effective, the before weights must be
significantly less than the after weights; hence, the mean of the
differences must be less than zero.
- H0: µD
≥0 and H1:µD
< 0 (claim)
- Find the critical value.
- The degrees of freedom are n - 1. In this case, d.f. = 8 - 1 = 7.
- The critical value for a left-tailed
test with α= 0.05 is
-1.895.
- Compute the test value.
- Make a table.
- Find the differences and place the results in column A.
- 204 - 217 = -13
- 229 - 240 = -11
- 190 - 187 = +3
- 207 - 205 = +2
- 266 - 277 = -11
- 256 - 254 = +2
- 217 - 228 = -11
- 216 - 216 = 0
-
ΣD = -39
- Find the mean of the differences.
- Square the differences and place the results in column B.
- (-13)2 =169
- (-11)2 = 121
- (+3)2 = 9
- (+2)2 = 4
- (-11)2 = 121
- (+2)2 = 4
- (-11)2 = 121
- 02 = 0
- ΣD2 = 549
- The completed table is:
- Find the standard deviation of the differences.
- Find the test value.
- Make the decision.
- The decision is to reject the null hypothesis at
α= 0.05, since -1.926 <
-1.895, as shown below.
- Summarize the results.
- There is enough evidence to support the claim that the
vitamin increases the strength of weight lifters.
Return to objectives
A dietician wishes to see if a person's cholesterol level will change if the
diet is supplemented by a certain mineral. Six subjects were pretested, and then
they took the mineral supplement for a 6-week period. (Cholesterol level is
measured in milligrams per deciliter.) Can it be concluded that the cholesterol
level has been changed at α= 0.10? Assume
that the variable is approximately normally distributed.
| Subject |
 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
 |
| Before (X1) |
 |
|
213 |
|
230 |
|
201 |
|
188 |
|
173 |
|
245 |
 |
| After (X2) |
 |
|
179 |
|
153 |
|
204 |
|
174 |
|
174 |
|
204 |
- State the hypotheses and identify the claim.
- If the diet is effective, the before cholesterol levels
should be different from the after levels.
- H0:
µD
= 0 and H1:µD
not = 0 (claim)
- Find the critical value.
- The degrees of freedom are 6-1=5.
- The critical value for a two tailed test with
α= 0.10 is 2.015.
- Compute the test value.
- Make a table.
- Find the differences and place the results in column A.
- 213 - 179 = 34
- 230 - 153 = 77
- 201 - 204 = -3
- 188 - 174 = 14
- 173 - 174 = -1
- 245 - 204 = 41
-
ΣD = 162
- Find the mean of the differences.
- Square the differences and place the results in column B.
- (34)2 = 1156
- (77)2 = 5929
- (-3)2 = 9
- (14)2 = 196
- (-1)2 = 1
- (41)2 = 1681
- ΣD2 =
8972
- The completed table is shown next.
- Find the standard deviation of the differences.
- Find the test value.
- Make the decision.
- The decision is to reject the null hypothesis, since the
test value is in the critical region.
- Summarize the results.
- There is enough evidence to support the claim that the
mineral changes a person's cholesterol level.
Return to objectives
The formula for calculating the confidence interval for the mean
difference:
A dietician wishes to see if a person's cholesterol level will change if the
diet is supplemented by a certain mineral. Six subjects were pretested, and then
they took the mineral supplement for a 6-week period. (Cholesterol level is
measured in milligrams per deciliter.) Find the 90% confidence interval for the
data. Assume that the variable is approximately normally distributed.
| Subject |
 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
 |
| Before (X1) |
 |
|
214 |
|
235 |
|
203 |
|
192 |
|
170 |
|
240 |
 |
| After (X2) |
 |
|
172 |
|
160 |
|
204 |
|
188 |
|
173 |
|
193 |
- State the hypotheses and identify the claim.
- If the diet is effective, the before cholesterol levels
should be different from the after levels.
- H0:
µD
= 0 and H1:µD
not = 0 (claim)
- Calculate the confidence interval
- Locate the formula for confidence interval for small
dependent samples
- Find the mean of the differences.
- Square the differences and find the sum.
- Find the standard deviation of the differences.
- Find the degrees of Freedom
- 6-1= 5 degrees of freedom.
- Look up the tα/2
score for α
= 0.10 for a two tailed t. (Note: 90% confidence interval
gives an alpha of 1-.90 = 0.10)
- Substitute the values calculated in the above steps in
the formula for confidence interval
-
- 27.333 - 26.379 < µD
< 27.333 + 26.379
- 0.954 < µD<
53.712
- Make Decision
- Since 0 is not contained in the interval, the decision
is to reject the null hypothesis H0:
µD
= 0
- Summarize findings
- There is enough evidence to support the claim that the
mineral changes a person's cholesterol level.
Return to objectives
- For dependent samples the dependent samples t test is used
When you finish these notes, then close this window to return to where
you were.